Montana Polling

Summary

The electorate is deeply divided and unsettled, with Democrats driving pessimism about the state’s direction. Both partisan candidates are largely unknown and lack firm support at this time. Seth Bodnar stands out with stronger favorability, growing recognition, and a narrow lead, benefiting from voters’ clear openness—especially among Democrats—to an independent, nontraditional candidate.

Key Findings

Montanans are deeply divided in their outlook.

Just 40% of likely voters overall feel the state is headed in the right direction, and 46% say it is off on the wrong track, which is largely unchanged from January. This negativity is driven almost entirely by Democratic voters, 85% of whom are unhappy with the direction of the state. Republican voters largely feel optimistic (66% right direction).

Voters are unfamiliar with and uncommitted to the partisan candidates.

Neither Democrat Reilly Neill nor Republican Kurt Alme are well-known. Three-quarters (77%) of likely voters have low or no familiarity with Neill; 74% with Alme. Neill enjoys somewhat better recognition among likely Democratic primary voters, but only marginally (66% unfamiliar) and favorability is soft among those who do know her (26% favorable, 8% unfavorable).

Likely Republican primary voters do not have any better understanding of Alme than voters overall – 79% are unfamiliar and just 13% feel favorably (8% unfavorable).

This lack of familiarity with the partisan candidates perhaps explains the high level of uncertainty for the June primaries. Both likely Democratic and Republican primary voters are largely unsure of who they plan to vote for in June (69% and 71% unsure, respectively). A fifth of Democratic primary voters say they’d vote for Neill, but most of that support is soft (6% certain to vote for Neill, 14% undecided but lean towards Neill).

Seth Bodnar outpaces others in recognition and favorability.

Seth Bodnar, not well known in January, is slowly improving his name ID throughout the state (from 70% unfamiliar in January to 60% unfamiliar in March). He sits at a comfortable +9 net favorability rating with likely voters overall (compared to +1 for Neill and -9 for Alme). Bodnar’s favorability is driven by Democratic voters, half of whom feel favorably towards him (+40 net). Independents also have positive opinions of Bodnar (+19 net).

Democratic voters prioritize electability over party loyalty.

They are open to a non-Democratic candidate (32% prefer the candidate who is most likely to defeat the Republican candidate over a Democratic candidate who best represents Democratic values, and 49% say both are equally important).

In a hypothetical election between Republican Kurt Alme and an opponent, one-in-five Democratic voters say they would rather vote for an independent candidate. 62% would prefer a Democratic candidate, but only 32% feel strongly, with 50% who only slightly prefer a Democratic candidate or actively prefer an independent.

Majorities (81%) also find it appealing when a candidate is “not beholden to party bosses, ”including 88% of Democratic voters, compared to 68% of Democratic voters who like a candidate that identifies as strongly liberal. That 20-point gap among Democrats matters – though Democratic voters may prefer to see a Democrat on the ticket, they are hungry for a candidate with a moderate approach and open to an independent who can win.

Bodnar holds a slight edge over Alme.

In a two-way race, Bodnar holds a narrow lead (39%) over Alme (36%). A quarter are undecided. After learning more about the candidates, 47% would vote for Bodnar, continuing to slightly outpace support for Alme (45%). Strong majorities of Democratic and independent voters support Bodnar, while Alme’s support is concentrated mainly among Republican voters.

High alignment with key pieces of Bodnar’s bio and platform.

Bodnar’s background and bio are appealing to a strong majority of likely voters (79%), whereas just 49% of voters resonate with Alme’s bio1 . Nine-in-ten Democratic voters appreciate Bodnar’s bio.

In blinded attribute-testing, key qualities associated with Bodnar test well – “not beholden to party bosses” is appealing to 81%, “is not a career politician” to 69%, and “has military service experience” to 60%. Alme’s key selling point right now – that he is endorsed by Donald Trump – lacks broad appeal (42% appealing, 44% unappealing).

Strong majorities resonate with Bodnar’s fight to protect Social Security and Medicare (82% appealing) and bring down costs (76% appealing). This is true across party lines, even among Republican voters.

Alme’s path to the ballot leaves him vulnerable.

Most (79%) find Senator Daines’ and Alme’s filing antics concerning 2 , including 69% of Republicans, 85% of independents, and 94% of Democrats. Even a majority of initial Alme supporters (57%) express concern.

A survey of 600 Likely 2026 Voters in Montana (Margin of Error: ±4.0)
Including oversamples of 100 each Dem and Rep Primary Voters
March 28-April 1, 2026

Landscape

In general, would you say things in Montana are heading in the right direction or are things off on the wrong track?

March Jan
Right direction40%39%
Wrong track46%47%
DK/REF14%15%

Now, I’m going to read you a list of some public figures, institutions, and other things you may have heard of, and I’d like you to tell me whether you have a very favorable, somewhat favorable, somewhat unfavorable, or very unfavorable opinion of each one. If you don’t recognize the name or if you recognize the name but do not have an opinion, please say so and we will move to the next name. Here is the first one…

Total fav Total unfav Very favorable Somewhat favorable Somewhat unfavorable Very unfavorable Recognize, no opinion Don't recognize DK/REF
Donald Trump 51% 48% 34% 17% 5% 43% 1% *
Seth Bodnar 24% 15% 8 17 10 5 11 43 6
Jan 21% 10% 7 14 4 6 17 46 7
Reilly Neill 12% 11% 5 7 3 8 7 63 7
Kurt Alme 9% 18% 5 4 7 11 7 59 7

Candidate Attributes

Now I’d like to understand how appealing or unappealing different qualities are when you think about candidates for public office. For each of the following, please indicate whether you find the quality to be very appealing, somewhat appealing, you have no opinion, somewhat unappealing, or very unappealing.

Total appeal Total unappeal Very appealing Somewhat appealing No opinion Somewhat unappealing Very unappealing DK/REF
Focuses on economic issues like jobs and inflation 95% 2% 66 29 3 1 1 *
Not beholden to party bosses 81% 5% 58 22 13 3 2 2
Identifies strongly as conservative (Reps) / liberal (Dems) 79% 7% 43 36 12 6 1 2
Is not a career politician 69% 7% 40 29 22 4 3 2
Focuses on border security and immigration 62% 30% 50 12 6 18 12 2
Has military service experience 60% 6% 21 39 33 4 1 1
Endorsed by Donald Trump 42% 44% 23 20 13 2 42 *

Primaries

(If likely Dem primary voter, n207) Moving on, if the Democratic primary election for U.S. Senate were held today, would you vote for Reilly Neill, Alani Bankhead, Michael Black Wolf, Michael Hummert, or Christopher Kehoe?

Reilly Neill20%
Alani Bankhead4%
Michael Black Wolf6%
Michael Hummert
Christopher Kehoe1%
Reilly Neill6%
Undecided, but lean towards Reilly Neill14%
Alani Bankhead2%
Undecided, but lean towards Alani Bankhead2%
Michael Black Wolf3%
Undecided, but lean towards Michael Black Wolf3%
Michael Hummert
Undecided, but lean towards Michael Hummert
Christopher Kehoe
Undecided, but lean towards Christopher Kehoe1%
DK/REF69%

(If likely Rep primary voter, n347) Moving on, if the Republican primary election for U.S. Senate were held today, would you vote for Kurt Alme, Lee Calhoun, or Charles A. Walking Child?

Kurt Alme18%
Lee Calhoun7%
Charles A. Walking Child4%
Kurt Alme12%
Undecided, but lean towards Kurt Alme6%
Lee Calhoun1%
Undecided, but lean towards Lee Calhoun6%
Charles A. Walking Child2%
Undecided, but lean towards Charles A. Walking Child2%
DK/REF71%

General Election

(If self-identified Democrat, n=210) If the general election for the U.S. Senate in Montana was between Republican Kurt Alme and an opponent, would you rather vote for a Democratic opponent or an Independent opponent?

Total Democratic opponent62%
Total Independent opponent20%
Definitely a Democratic opponent32%
Probably a Democratic opponent30%
Probably an Independent opponent15%
Definitely an Independent opponent5%
Neither1%
DK/REF17%

(If self-identified Democrat, n=210) In the upcoming U.S. Senate race in Montana, which is more important to you as a Democratic voter — voting for the Democratic candidate who best represents Democratic values or the candidate most likely to defeat the Republican candidate?

March Jan
Voting for the Democratic candidate who best represents Democratic values18%18%
Voting for the candidate most likely to defeat the Republican candidate32%31%
Both are equally important49%50%
DK/REF2%1%

In January, question wording referred to Senator Daines instead of a generic Republican candidate.

Initial Vote (Candidate Scenarios)

If the election for U.S. Senate were held today and the candidates were Independent Seth Bodnar and Republican Kurt Alme, for whom would you vote?

Seth Bodnar39%
Kurt Alme36%
Independent Seth Bodnar32%
Undecided, but lean towards Independent Seth Bodnar8%
Republican Kurt Alme25%
Undecided, but lean towards Republican Kurt Alme11%
DK/REF25%

If the election for U.S. Senate were held today and the candidates were Independent Seth Bodnar, Republican Kurt Alme, and Libertarian Kyle Austin, for whom would you vote?

Seth Bodnar40%
Kurt Alme38%
Kyle Austin5%
Independent Seth Bodnar27%
Undecided, but lean towards Independent Seth Bodnar14%
Republican Kurt Alme30%
Undecided, but lean towards Republican Kurt Alme8%
Libertarian Kyle Austin2%
Undecided, but lean towards Libertarian Kyle Austin3%
DK/REF17%

If the election for U.S. Senate were held today and the candidates were Independent Seth Bodnar, Republican Kurt Alme, Democrat Reilly Neill, and Libertarian Kyle Austin, for whom would you vote?

Seth Bodnar23%
Kurt Alme42%
Reilly Neill15%
Kyle Austin4%
Independent Seth Bodnar14%
Undecided, but lean towards Independent Seth Bodnar10%
Republican Kurt Alme31%
Undecided, but lean towards Republican Kurt Alme11%
Democrat Reilly Neill9%
Undecided, but lean towards Democrat Reilly Neill6%
Libertarian Kyle Austin2%
Undecided, but lean towards Libertarian Kyle Austin2%
DK/REF15%

Bios

Next, here are some short statements about the potential candidates running for Senate in Montana. After each one, please indicate whether you find the information to be very appealing, somewhat appealing, not very appealing, or not at all appealing. — Bodnar bio

Seth Bodnar is an independent, the former president of the University of Montana, a West Point graduate who finished first in his class, a Rhodes Scholar, a Green Beret and veteran of the 101st Airborne Division who served in Iraq, a lieutenant colonel in the Montana National Guard, and a former General Electric executive. Bodnar will bring accountability and real solutions to Washington by lowering costs, ending political culture wars, protecting public lands, and putting Montana families and American competitiveness first.
Total appealing79%
Total not15%
Very appealing45%
Somewhat appealing34%
Not very appealing6%
Not at all appealing9%
DK/REF5%

Candidate bio — Kurt Alme

Kurt Alme is a Republican, a native Montanan from Great Falls, a Harvard Law School graduate, President Trump's twice-appointed U.S. Attorney for Montana, Governor Gianforte's former budget director, and the former president of the Yellowstone Boys and Girls Ranch Foundation serving at-risk youth. Alme has been endorsed by President Trump and is running to fight for border security, energy production, and Montana's farmers and ranchers.
Total appealing49%
Total not49%
Very appealing32%
Somewhat appealing17%
Not very appealing13%
Not at all appealing35%
DK/REF2%

Informed Vote

Now that you have more information, if the election for U.S. Senate were held today and the candidates were Independent Seth Bodnar and Republican Kurt Alme, for whom would you vote?

Seth Bodnar47%
Kurt Alme45%
Independent Seth Bodnar36%
Undecided, but lean towards Independent Seth Bodnar11%
Republican Kurt Alme33%
Undecided, but lean towards Republican Kurt Alme11%
DK/REF9%

Messages — ROTATE BODNAR POSITIVES

Here are some short statements that people have made in support of Seth Bodnar. After each one, please indicate whether you find the information to be very appealing, somewhat appealing, not very appealing, or not at all appealing. — Social Security

Seth Bodnar is standing up for hardworking families and seniors by fighting to protect Social Security and Medicare so people can count on the benefits they've earned.
March Jan
Total appealing82%75%
Total not13%21%
Very appealing45%45%
Somewhat appealing37%30%
Not very appealing4%9%
Not at all appealing8%12%
DK/REF5%4%

Bodnar message — Costs

Seth Bodnar is fighting to bring down costs and manage inflation to lower everyday prices and make life more affordable for Montanans.
March Jan
Total appealing76%78%
Total not18%18%
Very appealing49%42%
Somewhat appealing27%37%
Not very appealing11%5%
Not at all appealing8%13%
DK/REF5%3%

Bodnar message — Immigration

Seth Bodnar believes we need strong borders and enforcement of our immigration policies – but done without trampling on the individual liberties of American citizens.
Total appealing75%
Total not21%
Very appealing29%
Somewhat appealing45%
Not very appealing10%
Not at all appealing11%
DK/REF4%

Bodnar message — Nonpartisan

As an independent, Seth Bodnar doesn't answer to either the Democratic or Republican parties. Bodnar will fight for what is best for Montanans, not for the parties.
Total appealing70%
Total not23%
Very appealing41%
Somewhat appealing29%
Not very appealing12%
Not at all appealing11%
DK/REF7%

Bodnar message — Tariffs

Seth Bodnar will fight for common sense trade policy, not tariffs that drive up costs for Montana farmers and destroy export markets.
Total appealing57%
Total not37%
Very appealing35%
Somewhat appealing22%
Not very appealing22%
Not at all appealing15%
DK/REF6%

Chosen Successor Message

Here is a statement about the U.S. Senate race in Montana. Please tell me if you find the information to be very concerning, somewhat concerning, not very concerning, or not at all concerning.

In the final hours before the filing deadline, current Republican Senator Steve Daines abruptly stepped aside and cleared the field for Kurt Alme to run as the lone Republican candidate. To many voters, it feels less like a real choice and more like a decision made behind closed doors, where party insiders in D.C. chose Daines' successor and denied Montanans the chance to have a real say in who represents them.
Total concerning79%
Total not18%
Very concerning61%
Somewhat concerning18%
Not very concerning8%
Not at all concerning11%
DK/REF3%

Final Vote

One last time, if the election for U.S. Senate were held today and the candidates were Independent Seth Bodnar and Republican Kurt Alme, for whom would you vote?

Seth Bodnar49%
Kurt Alme44%
Independent Seth Bodnar40%
Undecided, but lean towards Independent Seth Bodnar9%
Republican Kurt Alme35%
Undecided, but lean towards Republican Kurt Alme9%
DK/REF7%